- 6 - of the documents that had been provided by decedent’s accountant to respondent’s examination office and Appeals Office, and respondent’s trial counsel initiated telephone conversations with employees of the Nevada casinos concerning the documentation that had been provided, as a result of which respondent’s trial counsel concluded that decedent in 2000 incurred with regard to his gambling activities, and was entitled to deduct in full, the total $2,580,200 in gambling losses claimed on decedent’s 2000 Federal income tax return. On or about February 28, 2005, the parties entered into a settlement under the terms of which it was agreed that the $2,092,364 in gambling losses that had been disallowed by respondent in respondent’s notice of deficiency would be conceded by respondent. Also, as part of the settlement, it was agreed that no claim would be made by the estate for the recovery of litigation costs, but the estate reserved the right to make a claim for administrative costs. On March 28, 2005, the estate filed the instant motion for recovery of $1,657.50 in administrative costs, plus additional costs of prosecuting the instant motion. Respondent agrees that under the settlement that was entered into the estate substantially prevailed with regard to the amount in controversy.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011