Estate of Graciano V. Espinoza, Deceased, Elvira Expinoza, Executrix - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          of the documents that had been provided by decedent’s accountant            
          to respondent’s examination office and Appeals Office, and                  
          respondent’s trial counsel initiated telephone conversations with           
          employees of the Nevada casinos concerning the documentation that           
          had been provided, as a result of which respondent’s trial                  
          counsel concluded that decedent in 2000 incurred with regard to             
          his gambling activities, and was entitled to deduct in full, the            
          total $2,580,200 in gambling losses claimed on decedent’s 2000              
          Federal income tax return.                                                  
               On or about February 28, 2005, the parties entered into a              
          settlement under the terms of which it was agreed that the                  
          $2,092,364 in gambling losses that had been disallowed by                   
          respondent in respondent’s notice of deficiency would be conceded           
          by respondent.                                                              
               Also, as part of the settlement, it was agreed that no claim           
          would be made by the estate for the recovery of litigation costs,           
          but the estate reserved the right to make a claim for                       
          administrative costs.                                                       
               On March 28, 2005, the estate filed the instant motion for             
          recovery of $1,657.50 in administrative costs, plus additional              
          costs of prosecuting the instant motion.                                    
               Respondent agrees that under the settlement that was entered           
          into the estate substantially prevailed with regard to the amount           
          in controversy.                                                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011