Davis and Lois Etkin - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
         which reduced their total outstanding income tax liability from              
         $55,362.13 on March 21, 2002, to $45,776.13 on September 16,                 
         2003.                                                                        
              The factors petitioner Lois Etkin set forth for entitlement             
         to section 6015(f) equitable relief for the taxable year 2000 are            
         virtually identical to the factors set forth in her claim for                
         equitable relief associated with the taxable years 1997-99.                  
              2.   Hearing                                                            
              During a phone call to the Appeals officer on August 13,                
         2003, petitioners proposed an installment agreement to satisfy               
         their outstanding joint liabilities for the taxable years 1997               
         through 2000.  The proposed agreement provided that petitioners              
         would pay $762.94 per month, which would have fully satisfied                
         their outstanding income tax liability of $45,776.13 within 5                
         years.  On July 21, 2003, the Appeals Office issued a letter to              
         petitioners informing them that Lois Etkin was not entitled to               
         equitable relief under section 6015(f) and inviting petitioners              
         to raise any additional issues regarding their hearing.                      
         Petitioners did not have legal representation during the hearing             
         for the taxable year 2000.  After a phone call with the Appeals              
         officer in response to the Appeals Office’s July 21, 2003,                   
         letter, petitioners agreed to raise any additional issues by mail            
         within 10 days, but failed to do so.  The Appeals officer                    
         followed the administrative procedures which require requesting a            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011