Davis and Lois Etkin - Page 29

                                       - 29 -                                         
        disqualified assets are transferred to the requesting spouse by               
        the nonrequesting spouse, relief will be available only to the                
        extent that the liability exceeds the value of those disqualified             
        assets.  Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.01(6).  Petitioners presented             
        no evidence of the value of the disqualified assets.  However, on             
        the basis of the figures on the financial statement, the combined             
        value of the home, the boat, and the automobile is at least                   
        $210,000.9                                                                    
             Petitioners’ only rebuttal to respondent’s contentions is                
        that Davis Etkin transferred this property to Lois Etkin because              
        of their marriage.  However, this argument loses much of its                  
        credibility in light of the fact that Davis Etkin transferred the             
        property to Lois Etkin over 10 years after they were married.  In             
        addition, the transfer of the house occurred proximately to the               
        filing of the liens for the taxable years 1997-99 and before the              
        April 2002 Federal tax lien was filed for the taxable year 2000.              
        The car and the boat were transferred to Lois Etkin after the                 

             8(...continued)                                                          
          date on which the first letter of proposed deficiency which                 
          allows the taxpayer an opportunity for administrative review in             
          the Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals is sent shall be             
          presumed to have as its principal purpose the avoidance of tax or           
          the payment of tax.  Respondent does not rely on this presumption           
          in this case since there was no notice of deficiency or of                  
          proposed deficiency.                                                        
               9Given the outdated nature of the statement, it is plausible           
          that these values have slightly fluctuated; however, this does              
          not concern us in light of the fact that the estimate exceeds the           
          tax liability by approximately 400 percent.                                 





Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011