Donald Marion and Bethany Diane Fenton - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal             
          income tax of $6,858 for 2001.                                              
               The issue for decision is whether petitioners are liable for           
          the 10-percent additional tax on early distributions pursuant to            
          section 72(t).                                                              
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the exhibits received into evidence            
          are incorporated herein by reference.  Petitioners resided in               
          Clarkston, Michigan, at the time the petition was filed.                    
          During 2001, Donald Marion Fenton (petitioner) was an                       
          automotive engineer with the IBM Corporation, and Bethany Diane             
          Fenton was a homemaker.  Petitioners timely filed their 2001                
          Federal income tax return.                                                  
               In late 2001, after petitioner was laid off from IBM, he               
          received two distributions from the IBM Corporation 401(k) Plan             
          in the total amount of $68,583.  The 401(k) plan is a retirement            
          plan qualified under section 401(a).  Petitioners reported the              
          distributions from the 401(k) plan as income on their 2001                  
          return.  Petitioners did not compute the 10-percent additional              
          tax due on early distributions from qualified retirement plans.             
               Petitioner used the funds to pay family expenses, including            
          the downpayment on a home and college tuition for his daughter.             
          Petitioner also used the funds to pay family support expenses,              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011