Richard Lewis Field - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, was a Schedule C which listed            
          seven different activities:  (1) Richard L. Field, Ph.D,                    
          Consulting Engineer; (2) Sol Pub Co.; (3) Field Investment                  
          Management; (4) Field Oil and Gas; (5) Field Vehicle Sales; (6)             
          Field Real Estate; and (7) Field Entertainment.                             
               Petitioner was also a volunteer with the Houston Symphony              
          Chorus (Chorus).  From July 8 through 17, 2000, he traveled with            
          the Chorus on a tour of England and Wales at a cost of $1,545.93.           
          Petitioner deducted the travel expenses related to this tour as             
          charitable contributions on Schedule A.                                     
                                     Discussion                                       
               Generally, the Commissioner’s determinations in a notice of            
          deficiency are presumed correct, and the taxpayer has the burden            
          of proving that those determinations are erroneous.  See Rule               
          142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).  In some              
          cases the burden of proof with respect to relevant factual issues           
          may shift to the Commissioner under section 7491(a).  Petitioner            
          did not present evidence or argument that he satisfied the                  
          requirements of section 7491(a).  Therefore, the burden of proof            
          does not shift to respondent.                                               
          A.   Deductions Claimed on Schedule C                                       
               Tax deductions are a matter of legislative grace with a                
          taxpayer bearing the burden of proving entitlement to the                   
          deductions claimed.  Rule 142(a)(1); INDOPCO, Inc. v.                       






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011