- 7 -
would grant respondent’s motion and deem admitted for purposes of
this case the affirmative allegations in the answer.
On June 21, 2004, petitioner filed a reply. In the reply,
petitioner admitted respondent received a proposed set of
stipulations from petitioner; petitioner attached the Form W-2
for 1997 from Enterprise Network Sys., Inc., listing petitioner’s
name and address; and petitioner admitted that the Form W-2 has a
typographical error in which the numerals in petitioner’s Social
Security number have been transposed. Petitioner denied that a
deficiency exists or that any additions to tax are justified.
On June 22, 2004, the Court denied respondent’s motion for
entry of order that undenied allegations in the answer to the
amended petition be deemed admitted.
By notice dated June 30, 2004, the Court set this case for
trial at the Court’s Dallas, Texas, session beginning December 6,
2004. This notice specifically stated: “YOUR FAILURE TO APPEAR
MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND ENTRY OF DECISION AGAINST
YOU.” Attached to this notice was the Court’s standing pretrial
order.
On November 12, 2004, the Court lodged respondent’s
objection to petitioner’s request for admissions. Respondent
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011