- 8 - regulatory, financial, and tax reporting purposes.” FPL Group, Inc. & Subs. v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. at 570. It is undisputed that respondent’s examination of the repair versus capital expenses issue involved application of the standards set forth in section 1.162-4, Income Tax Regs. That regulation sets forth the general legal standards for deducting repair expenses.3 Petitioner characterizes this regulation as the “method of accounting” that respondent used during the examination. Respondent disagrees with petitioner’s argument that section 1.162-4, Income Tax Regs., constitutes a “method of accounting”. We do not accept petitioner’s characterization of section 1.162-4, Income Tax Regs., as a “method of accounting” distinguishable from petitioner’s method of using the FERC/FPSC regulatory standards. Petitioner has stated that it used the 3 Sec. 1.162-4, Income Tax Regs., provides: � 1.162-4. Repairs.--The cost of incidental repairs which neither materially add to the value of the property nor appreciably prolong its life, but keep it in an ordinarily efficient operating condition, may be deducted as an expense, provided the cost of acquisition or production or the gain or loss basis of the taxpayer’s plant, equipment, or other property, as the case may be, is not increased by the amount of such expenditures. Repairs in the nature of replacements, to the extent that they arrest deterioration and appreciably prolong the life of the property, shall either be capitalized and depreciated in accordance with section 167 or charged against the depreciation reserve if such an account is kept.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011