FPL Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries - Page 46

                                               - 132 -                                                  
            net firm interchange  power available to the FPL system during                              
            the 1988-1992 * * * which includes a 2000 MW firm interchange                               
            from Southern.”  Some documents do not reference the Southern                               
            company contracts at all; i.e., BI Nos. 304 and ER Nos. 1984,                               
            1479, and 3276.  Other documents appear to relate to the Southern                           
            company contracts; for example, ER No. 5334, which concerns the                             
            installation of one 500-kV bus tie breaker at the Poinsett                                  
            substation, states:  “With the present configuration * * * a                                
            maintenance outage of one of the mid-breakers greatly reduces                               
            FPL’s import capability.”  Also, BI No. 129 and ER Nos. 9326,                               
            9327, 9329, 9334, 9337 state:  “While importing large amounts of                            
            power”.  (Emphasis added.)                                                                  
                  Respondent cites United States v. Commonwealth Energy Sys.,                           
            235 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2000), for the proposition that FPL’s                                 
            property at issue was not readily identifiable with the Southern                            
            company contracts, and as such, should not receive transition                               
            relief.  The court explained that the legislative history                                   
            indicated that the specifications and amount of the property must                           
            be readily ascertainable from the source documents, which are the                           
            contract and related documents.  Id. at 16.  Because the statute                            
            requires that the specifications and amounts of property be                                 
            ascertainable, this examination must be specific, but not exact.                            
            Id.  In that case the taxpayer sought an ITC for replacement                                
            property.  Id. at 13.  The court found that the taxpayer could                              





Page:  Previous  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011