Charles F. and Susan G. Glass - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          the exception of recreational watercraft used by people staying             
          on the shoreline on or near the property, recreational watercraft           
          generally do not use those waters because a public harbor is not            
          relatively close to the property.  The recreational watercraft              
          that do use those waters do so mainly in July and August and,               
          with the exception of recreational watercraft used by people                
          staying on the shoreline on or near the property, seldom come               
          close to the shoreline of the property.  In the winter, only                
          freighters use the waters near the property, and they do so at a            
          distance that is approximately 1 mile into the water.                       
               Few people walk the Lake Michigan shoreline in Emmet County            
          at times other than in the summer.  In the summer (primarily July           
          and August), many people walk that shoreline, and many people               
          believe that the public is allowed to walk along any part of a              
          Great Lake shoreline up to the ordinary high water mark.7  Some             
          people do not walk on private beaches on Lake Michigan because              
          they view those beaches as the private property of another.  The            
          people who walk the shoreline on or near the property are                   


               7 In Glass v. Goeckel, 683 N.W.2d 719 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004),           
          the court ruled contrary to this belief that people who own land            
          on Lake Huron have the exclusive right to use and enjoy that land           
          up to the water’s edge.  The trial court had ruled that the                 
          public had a right to walk on the portion of that land that was             
          between the ordinary highwater mark and the water’s edge.  In               
          reversing the trial court, the court of appeals held that the               
          general public may pass that land only by walking in the water.             
          The Supreme Court of Michigan agreed to hear an appeal of that              
          case and is currently considering this issue.                               




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011