Timothy J. Glenn - Page 19

                                       - 18 -                                         
          be considered in determining whether an individual qualifies for            
          relief under section 6015(f).  Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.01,               
          2003-2 C.B. at 297, lists seven conditions which must be                    
          satisfied before the Commissioner will consider a request for               
          relief under section 6015(f).                                               
               Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.03(2), 2003-2 C.B. at 298, lists            
          nonexclusive factors that the Commissioner will consider in                 
          determining whether, taking into account all the facts and                  
          circumstances, it is inequitable to hold the requesting spouse              
          liable for all or part of the unpaid income tax liability or                
          deficiency, and full or partial equitable relief under section              
          6015(f) should be granted.  Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.03, 2003-2           
          C.B. at 298, provides that the following factors are relevant to            
          whether the Commissioner will grant equitable relief:  (1)                  
          Marital status, (2) economic hardship, (3) knowledge or reason to           
          know, (4) the nonrequesting spouse’s legal obligation, (5)                  
          significant benefit, (6) compliance with income tax laws, (7)               
          abuse, and (8) mental or physical health.  Further, Rev. Proc.              
          2003-61, supra, provides that no single factor will be                      


          8(...continued)                                                             
          1 C.B. 447, and is effective either for requests for relief filed           
          on or after Nov. 1, 2003, or for requests for which no                      
          preliminary determination letter was issued as of Nov. 1, 2003.             
          In the present case, the request for relief was still pending as            
          of Nov. 1, 2003, and the preliminary determination letter was               
          issued on Dec. 19, 2003; therefore, Rev. Proc. 2003-61, 2003-2              
          C.B. 296, is applicable in the present situation.                           





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011