Carolyn A. Glenn - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $16,584 in the joint             
          Federal income tax of petitioner and petitioner’s former spouse,            
          Timothy J. Glenn (Mr. Glenn),1 and an accuracy-related penalty of           
          $3,317 pursuant to section 6662(a) for the taxable year 2001.               
               After concessions, the issue for decision is whether                   
          respondent abused his discretion in denying petitioner relief               
          from joint and several liability for the tax deficiency and                 
          accuracy-related penalty pursuant to section 6015.2                         
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in               
          Hoffman Estates, Illinois, on the date the petition was filed in            
          this case.                                                                  



          1Timothy J. Glenn’s case at docket No. 7249-04S was tried                   
          consecutively with petitioner’s case on this Court’s Chicago,               
          Illinois, session beginning Nov. 29, 2004.  These cases were not            
          consolidated because of an objection by petitioner.                         
          2A joint notice of deficiency was mailed to petitioner and                  
          Mr. Glenn on Feb. 25, 2004.  Mr. Glenn filed a timely petition              
          with this Court on Apr. 26, 2004, at docket No. 7249-04S seeking            
          a redetermination of the deficiency relating to the additional              
          tax under sec. 72(t) and the accuracy-related penalty pursuant to           
          sec. 6662(a).  Petitioner filed her petition on June 3, 2004.               
          This Court has no jurisdiction to redetermine the deficiency                
          related to the additional tax under sec. 72(t) nor the accuracy-            
          related penalty pursuant to sec. 6662(a) as to petitioner’s                 
          petition because the petition for such redetermination would be             
          untimely.                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011