- 8 - attaches, extends to the entire subject of the correct tax for the particular year.” Erickson v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 202, 309 F.2d 760, 767 (1962). An agreed or stipulated judgment is a judgment on the merits for purposes of res judicata. In re Baker, 74 F.3d 906, 910 (9th Cir. 1996); see also United States v. Intl. Bldg. Co., 345 U.S. 502, 503-506 (1953) (recognizing res judicata effect of stipulated Tax Court decisions); accord Erickson v. United States, supra at 768; Krueger v. Commissioner, 48 T.C. 824, 828- 829 (1967). Respondent issued to petitioners a notice of deficiency with respect to the subject taxable years, petitioners petitioned for redetermination, and the case was concluded without trial by entry of a stipulated decision on February 7, 1994. Here, petitioners would like to argue that the statutory notice of deficiency was issued outside the period of limitations for the years involved. Petitioners could have made this challenge in their pleadings in the earlier Tax Court proceeding as an affirmative defense under Rule 39, Pleading Special Matters. The validity of the notice of deficiency is a matter that could have been raised and litigated in connection with the deficiency proceeding, involving these same petitioners, and the same tax years. Because the decision in that case was not appealed and has since become final, res judicata precludesPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011