- 40 - 2. Badges of Fraud Courts have developed several objective indicators, or "badges", of fraud. Recklitis v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 874, 910 (1988). The following badges of fraud are present in this case as to petitioner for the years shown: (a) Substantially understating his income by diverting it to his children (1995, 1998, 1999), attorney (1998), C.P.A. (1998), and office manager (1995, 1998); (b) concealing income from petitioners' tax return preparer (1998); (c) having false or inadequate books and records; (d) creating false legal documents and concealing assets from potential creditors (1995); (e) disguising personal expenses as business expenses (1998, 1999); (f) concealing income through complex series of transactions and nominees (1995, 1998); and (g) giving implausible or inconsistent explanations to respondent’s examiner and in court about events during the years in issue. a. Substantially Understating Income A pattern of substantially underreporting income for several years is strong evidence of fraud. Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 137-139 (1954); Spies v. United States, 317 U.S. 492, 499 (1943). Petitioners substantially underreported their income in 1995, 1998, and 1999. Petitioner testified that he thought the partnership income was not taxable to him because it was “vested” in the partnershipPage: Previous 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011