- 3 - On his 1998 Federal income tax return, petitioner claimed an earned income credit under section 32(a) in the amount of $1,861. The entire amount of the credit was disallowed in the notice of deficiency on the ground that the child did not reside with petitioner during the year in question as required by section 32(c)(3)(A)(ii). Petitioner’s concession of the head-of- household issue confirms that the child did not live with petitioner more than one-half of the taxable year as required by section 32(c)(3)(A)(ii). Respondent agrees that, under section 32(c)(1)(A)(ii), a taxpayer is entitled to the earned income credit if such taxpayer does not have a qualifying child (as is the situation here) but satisfies the following conditions: (1) The taxpayer’s principal place of abode was in the United States for more than one-half of the taxable year; (2) the taxpayer had attained age 25 and not attained age 65 on or before the close of the taxable year; and (3) the taxpayer was not a dependent for whom a deduction is allowable under section 151 to another taxpayer for the taxable year at issue. Sec. 32(c)(1)(A)(ii)(I), (II), and (III). While petitioner in this case satisfies these requirements, there is a further limitation petitioner does not satisfy. Section 32(b) provides a phaseout of the credit where the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income exceeds certain prescribedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011