- 3 - Petitioner is a U.S. citizen who during the subject years resided in Germany and was employed there as an attorney. During 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000, his income was derived entirely from foreign sources, and he did not report an AMT liability as to the income. For each of the years in issue, he had foreign tax available for credit, entitling him to foreign tax credits under section 59(a), and tentative AMT, as follows: Foreign Tax Available Sec. 59(a) Tentative Year for Credit Credit AMT 1997 $75,148 $44,008 $36,627 1998 42,586 27,762 22,026 1999 65,161 34,822 28,324 2000 37,730 17,477 13,193 Petitioner first filed income tax returns for these years in January 2003. Discussion While acknowledging that section 59(a)(2)(A) supports respondent’s determination in full, petitioner argues that section 59(a)(2)(A) is inapplicable to this case as it was superseded by article 23(1). Petitioner urges that this Court was misguided in Pekar v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 158, 163 (1999), and Brooke v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-194, affd. 13 Fed. Appx. 7 (D.C. Cir. 2001), where we held that article 23(1) harmonizes with the application of section 59(a)(2)(A) because article 23(1) states that the U.S.-Germany treaty shall apply inPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011