- 3 - 6651(a)(1) (failure to file a return), 6651(a)(2) (failure to pay tax shown on a return), and 6654 (failure to pay estimated income tax) for the 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001 taxable years as follows: Year Deficiency 6651(a)(1) 6651(a)(2) 6654 1998 $44,291 $9,965.48 $11,072.75 $2,010.24 1999 $29,625 $6,665.63 $7,258.13 $1,422.71 2000 $39,652 $8,921.70 $7,335.62 $2,132.64 2001 $45,724 $10,287.90 $5,715.50 $1,809.44 Petitioner timely filed a petition with this Court asserting “all of his inalienable rights and commercial rights at Natural Law, Common Law and Maritime Law, as well as any statutory rights that may exist and apply.” and raised numerous typical tax protester arguments including: (1) The Secretary, including the IRS, is not authorized to practice law in this state. Yet, every single publication, and practically every letter, includes statements that can be considered as nothing but the rendering of legal advice, especially regarding the accounting method applicable and thus the form suitable for using that accounting method. Whatever else this fact may support, the IRS has tendered legal advice to petitioner, giving rise, at the very least, to a definite conflict of interest. (2) The Secretary acts as a collection agent for an undisclosed principal, which principal is an unknown beneficiary of the alleged fiduciary obligation at issue. * * * Without a known beneficiary, petitioner has no fiduciary obligation.[2] (3) There being no principal amount due, there is no basis for penalties. (4) There being no 2 Petitioner warns respondent that it is a potentially serious offense to use the United States Postal Service to attempt to coerce an alleged fiduciary to divert funds from a known beneficiary to an unknown beneficiary.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011