- 4 - and 1999 tax returns.4 Petitioner failed to attend the December 3, 2004, meeting, and he did not contact respondent to discuss rescheduling options. This case was first set for trial during the Court’s March 14, 2005, New York, New York, trial session. A notice setting case for trial, dated October 8, 2004, and a standing pretrial order were sent to petitioner. On December 27, 2004, respondent filed requests for admission. Petitioner’s response to the request for admissions was due on January 24, 2005. The Court did not receive a response to the request for admissions from petitioner, and, as a result, the statements of fact in the request for admissions were deemed admitted pursuant to Rule 90(c). By letter dated February 4, 2005, petitioner stated that he did not attend the December 3, 2004, meeting because respondent had not mailed him his remaining tax returns. Petitioner also stated that he had contacted his previous employers, who informed him that they no longer had his records for the years in issue. He requested copies of his Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statements, and Forms 1099 from respondent for years 1989 through 1993. On March 2, 2005, petitioner, via teleconference with the Court and respondent’s counsel, requested a continuance due to 4Respondent contends that these were the only returns of petitioner that respondent possessed as of that date.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011