Glenn Hightower - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          account that petitioner had opened in his own name solely to hold           
          the funds.                                                                  
               In a letter to O’Dowd dated October 13, 2000, petitioner’s             
          attorney stated:  (a) Petitioner would tender his shares of Green           
          Hills to O’Dowd, as required by the arbitrator’s award under                
          protest, and without waiver of any rights or remedies; (b) the              
          shares were to be held in trust; and (c) petitioner was not                 
          entitled to the checks.  Petitioner delivered his stock to O’Dowd           
          on October 13, 2000.  Petitioner did not endorse the shares.                
               Interest was credited to petitioner’s account in the amounts           
          of $469,593.63 in 2000 and $1,513,788.28 in 2001.  There were no            
          transactions on the account in 2000 or 2001 other than the                  
          crediting of interest and withholding of Federal income tax.                
               In a letter to petitioner’s attorney dated November 21,                
          2000, O’Dowd’s attorney stated that the account into which                  
          petitioner had deposited the $41,585,388 was not a trust account.           
          O’Dowd’s attorney offered to hold the funds for petitioner in the           
          attorney’s trust account.  Petitioner did not respond to the                
          offer.                                                                      
          D.   Later Events Relating to the Arbitration                               
               In February 2001, the Court of Appeal denied petitioner’s              
          request to stay the arbitration proceedings.  Petitioner filed a            
          motion for rehearing with the Court of Appeal, and the motion was           
          denied.  Petitioner filed a petition for review in the Supreme              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011