Gloria Yuen-Mee Ho and Alexander Chi-Shun Tsang - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
               On November 24, 2003, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)               
          mailed to petitioners a notice of deficiency disallowing                    
          petitioner’s $2,000 deduction for his IRA contribution in 2001.             
          On June 28, 2004, the IRS mailed to petitioners a notice of                 
          deficiency disallowing petitioner’s $3,000 deduction for his IRA            
          contribution in 2002.  Petitioners have conceded the issue for              
          2002.                                                                       
                                     Discussion                                       
               With certain limitations, a taxpayer is entitled to deduct             
          the amounts that the taxpayer contributes to an IRA.  See sec.              
          219(a).  The deduction, however, may not exceed the lesser of               
          (1) $2,000 or (2) an amount equal to the compensation includable            
          in the taxpayer's gross income.  See sec. 219(b)(1).                        
               If, for any part of a taxable year, a taxpayer or the                  
          taxpayer’s spouse is an “active participant” in a qualified plan            
          under section 403(b), the amount of the deduction allowed under             
          section 219(a) for that year may be further limited.  See sec.              
          219(g)(1), (5)(A)(iv).  In the case of a married taxpayer who               
          files a joint income tax return, the $2,000 limitation of section           
          219(b)(1) is reduced using a ratio determined by dividing the               
          excess of the taxpayer's modified AGI over the applicable dollar            
          amount, which is $53,000 for 2001, by $10,000.  See sec.                    
          219(g)(2)(A), (3)(B)(i).  Because this case deals with a taxpayer           
          who was an active participant and who was married and filed a               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011