- 6 - testify at trial) advised Mr. McNichol of the necessity of having a Form 8332 to attach to his 1992 return to allow him the dependency exemption deductions of the two children for that year. The preparer provided Mr. McNichol with a blank Form 8332, which he was instructed to present to his former wife for her signature. Mr. McNichol presented the form to his former wife and, in a rather tense atmosphere, petitioner signed only Part II of the form. Mr. McNichol did not question his former wife as to the significance of her signature on that part of the form, and he immediately delivered the signed blank form to his return preparer. The return preparer expressed surprise that petitioner signed Part II but opined to Mr. McNichol that, since Part I was not signed, he would not be able to claim the dependency exemption deductions for 1992. At that point, the return preparer prepared a new Form 8332, in which the preparer completed both Parts I and II and directed Mr. McNichol to return and obtain petitioner’s signature for both Parts I and II. Mr. McNichol immediately went back to his former wife with directions that she sign both Parts I and II as required by the return preparer. Again, in a tense atmosphere, petitioner signed both Parts I and II of Form 8332. In his testimony at trial, Mr. McNichol acknowledged that he was expecting that his former wife would release the dependency exemptions for only 1 year, 1992. That was also thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011