- 5 - objections. Since that time, petitioner has filed numerous lengthy motions and documents with the Court espousing frivolous positions. Many of the motions have previously been denied. The Court set for hearing: (1) Respondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and (2) petitioner’s motion for partial summary judgment.3 On February 9, 2005, the Court ordered petitioner to show cause in writing on or before March 4, 2005, why a penalty should not be imposed pursuant to section 6673(a). On February 22, 2005, petitioner filed a Verified Motion for Ruling on Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside Defaults Against the petitioner Docketed on July 8, 2004, and a Verified Motion for Findings of Fact and Conclusions at Law. On February 23, 2005, petitioner filed a Motion to Postpone Answer to Order of February 9, 2004 Until Court Rules on Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside IRS Default Against Petitioner. All three motions contain frivolous allegations and were summarily denied. In response to the Order to show cause, petitioner filed a document entitled “Verified Answer to Order to Show Cause Why Penalty Should Not Be Imposed.” The document is replete with frivolous allegations.4 3 In October 2004, petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. The writ was denied on Dec. 21, 2004. 4 On the same date petitioner filed a “Verified Motion to Certify Issues for Review by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011