- 20 - January 30, 2000. In that return, petitioner did not include the $1.5 million at issue in gross income. Respondent issued a notice of deficiency (notice) to peti- tioner with respect to the year at issue. In the notice, respon- dent determined that petitioner is required to include the $1.5 million at issue in gross income for that year. OPINION Although respondent must have commenced respondent’s exami- nation of petitioner’s return for the year at issue after July 22, 1998, the parties do not address section 7491(a).16 In any event, we need not decide whether the burden of proof shifts to respondent under that section. That is because resolution of the issue presented here does not depend on who has the burden of proof. The parties’ sole dispute is whether the $1.5 million at issue constitutes a loan that is includable in petitioner’s gross income for the year at issue. The determination of whether a transfer of funds constitutes a loan is a question of fact. Haber v. Commissioner, 52 T.C. 255, 266 (1969), affd. per curiam 422 F.2d 198 (5th Cir. 1970). In order for a transfer of funds to constitute a loan, at the time the funds are transferred there must be an unconditional 16All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue.Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011