Myong Soo Kim and Sung Me Hwang - Page 13

                                        -13-                                          
         authorize the Commissioner to lengthen or shorten the 30-day                 
         period for requesting a section 6330 hearing.  Moorhous v.                   
         Commissioner, 116 T.C. 263, 270 n.5 (2001); Kennedy v.                       
         Commissioner, supra at 262.                                                  
              In this case, because petitioners did not timely request a              
         section 6330 hearing, petitioners were not entitled to such a                
         hearing and were not offered one.  Consequently, we shall grant              
         respondent’s deemed motion for summary judgment.                             
         IV.   Conclusion                                                             
              Although we deny respondent’s motion insofar as it asks us              
         to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction, it is clear that              
         petitioners are not entitled to relief under section 6330.  We               
         have treated respondent’s motion as a motion for summary                     
         judgment, and we shall grant respondent’s motion because                     
         petitioners did not timely request a section 6330 hearing.                   

                                                 An appropriate order and             
                                            decision will be entered.                 
















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  

Last modified: May 25, 2011