Leroy J. Klingaman - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          Petitioner had gambling losses in 2001 in excess of his gambling            
          winnings.1                                                                  
               On his timely filed 2001 Federal income tax return,                    
          petitioner did not report any gambling winnings or Social                   
          Security benefits.  Petitioner’s 2001 return reflects $14,119 in            
          adjusted gross income, consisting of $13,657 in pension payments,           
          $39 in taxable interest, $916 of ordinary dividends, and a                  
          capital loss of $493.  Petitioner claimed the applicable standard           
          deduction of $5,650.                                                        
               In a notice of deficiency, respondent determined that                  
          petitioner received $7,340 in unreported gambling winnings and              
          $1,002 in unreported taxable Social Security benefits (following            
          a computational adjustment to petitioner’s adjusted gross                   
          income).  Further, respondent determined that petitioner is                 
          entitled to deduct gambling losses of $7,340.                               







               1  Petitioner admits that he received additional gambling              
          winnings of less than $1,200 on several occasions that were not             
          subject to information reporting.  See sec. 7.6041-1(a),                    
          Temporary Income Tax Regs., 42 Fed. Reg. 33286 (June 30, 1977);             
          see also Lyszkowski v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-235                    
          (describing the information reporting requirements for slot                 
          machine jackpots), affd. without published opinion 79 F.3d 1138             
          (3d Cir. 1996).  Respondent’s determination of the deficiency was           
          limited to the gambling winnings subject to information                     
          reporting, and petitioner’s other winnings are not at issue in              
          this case.                                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011