Arthur R. Koskela - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
          were made to the pay phones that were assigned to him, and he did           
          not know the cost of these modifications.                                   
               Petitioner claimed a $4,875 tax credit for 2000, a $4,875              
          tax credit for 2001, and a $2,375 tax credit for 2002 on Forms              
          8826, Disabled Access Credit, with respect to the pay phones,               
          that were attached to his Federal income tax returns for the                
          years in issue.                                                             
               Alpha Telcom grew rapidly through its pay phone program but            
          was poorly managed and ultimately operated at a loss.  On August            
          24, 2001, Alpha Telcom filed for bankruptcy under chapter 11 of             
          the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern           
          District of Florida.  The matter was later transferred to the               
          U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon on September 17,           
          2001.  On July 26, 2002, petitioner filed a proof of claim in the           
          bankruptcy court in the amount of $90,000, representing the                 
          $90,000 that he had invested.2  The bankruptcy matter was                   
          dismissed on September 10, 2003, by motion of Alpha Telcom.  The            
          bankruptcy court held that it was in the best interest of                   
          creditors and the estate to dismiss the bankruptcy matter so that           
          proceedings could continue in Federal District Court, where there           


               2  Petitioner’s $90,000 payment represented the amount he              
          paid for a total of 18 pay phones.  Petitioner purchased 7 pay              
          phones from ATC, in addition to the 11 pay phones petitioner had            
          previously purchased from ATC.  Petitioner did not claim a sec.             
          44 credit for the additional 7 pay phones.  Those pay phones are            
          not before the Court.                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011