Dale J. Krohn - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          (a) Complied with substantiation requirements under the Internal            
          Revenue Code, sec. 7491(a)(2)(A); (b) maintained all records                
          required by the Internal Revenue Code, sec. 7491(a)(2)(B); and              
          (c) cooperated with reasonable requests by the Secretary for                
          information, documents, and meetings, id.  A taxpayer bears the             
          burden of proving that he or she has met the requirements of                
          section 7491(a).  See H. Conf. Rept. 105-599, at 239 (1998),                
          1998-3 C.B. 747, 993; S. Rept. 105-174, at 45 (1998), 1998-3 C.B.           
          537, 581.  Petitioner does not contend that he meets the                    
          requirements of section 7491(a), and the record shows that he did           
          not meet those requirements because he did not cooperate with               
          respondent.  Thus, petitioner bears the burden of proof except as           
          to the increased addition to tax.  See Rule 142(a); Welch v.                
          Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).                                        
               3.   Whether Petitioner’s Fifth Amendment Claims Affect the            
                    Burden of Proof                                                   
               Before trial, petitioner asserted Fifth Amendment rights               
          against self-incrimination.  However, even if petitioner’s claim            
          was bona fide (which we need not decide), it would have no effect           
          on petitioner’s burden of proof.  See United States v. Rylander,            
          460 U.S. 752, 758 (1983); Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 661,            
          684-685 (1989); Traficant v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 501, 504                 
          (1987), affd. 884 F.2d 258 (6th Cir. 1989).                                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011