Kenneth P. Krueger - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          shown on my return - and if any IRS employee attempts                       
               to do otherwise, they will do so at their own criminal                 
               and/or civil peril.                                                    
                              *   *   *   *   *   *   *                               
               I am requesting an office audit/meeting at which time you              
               should have available:                                                 
                    1.   The “text of any written determination and                   
                         any background file documents relating to                    
                         (the) determination” that my “zero” return                   
                         was not correct as provided in 26 USC 6610.                  
                    2.   Since Sections 6001 and 6011 (as referred to                 
                         in the Privacy Act Notice that is contained                  
                         in the 1040 booklet) only direct me to comply                
                         with Treasury regulations, I will expect you                 
                         to have the Treasury regulation that imposes                 
                         upon me a legal obligation to treat seriously                
                         the “changes” you have proposed in my 2000                   
                         return.                                                      
                    3.   The statute and implementing regulation that                 
                         allowed you to “change” my 2000 return, and                  
                    4.   Your Delegation Order from the Secretary of                  
                         Treasury authorizing you to act in his                       
                         behalf.                                                      
               On May 1, 2002, respondent mailed to petitioner and his wife           
          a notice of deficiency for 2000, in which respondent determined             
          that petitioner and his wife owed a deficiency of $4,574 and a              
          $915 accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) based upon              
          reported wages received from Southeastern Telephone Systems,                
          Inc., and the U.S. Air Force of $24,812 and $23,005,                        
          respectively, and miscellaneous income received from Nutrition              
          for Life International, Inc., of $657.                                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011