Albert James Lawless - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
               Petitioner timely filed with the Court a petition                      
          challenging the notice of deficiency.  Paragraph 4 of the                   
          petition states:                                                            
               A copy of my 1998 return was mailed when requested,                    
               summer of 2003.  Original return was filed 9-3-99.  The                
               statute of limitations had expired prior to the request                
               for a copy.  Notice of deficiency noted math errors and                
               a balance due.                                                         
          Discussion                                                                  
          A.   Statute of Limitations                                                 
               We must first decide whether the statute of limitations bars           
          the assessment of the deficiency in issue.  In doing so, we must            
          decide when petitioner filed his return.                                    
               Generally, an income tax must be assessed within 3 years               
          after the applicable return is filed (whether or not such return            
          was filed on or after the date prescribed).  Sec. 6501(a).  The             
          bar of the statute of limitations on assessment is an affirmative           
          defense, and the party raising it must specifically plead it and            
          carry the burden of proving its applicability.  Rules 39, 142(a).           
          If the taxpayer makes a prima facie case proving the filing date            
          of his or her income tax return and the expiration of the                   
          statutory period prior to the mailing of the notice of                      
          deficiency, the burden of going forward with the evidence shifts            

               4(...continued)                                                        
          Center had received and filed a copy of petitioner’s return on              
          July 10, 2003.  Although petitioner and his wife filed a joint              
          return for 1998, respondent mailed the notice of deficiency only            
          to petitioner.                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011