William M. Leggett - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          and the instant trial, petitioner stated:  “Well, I don’t have              
          enough information to refute anything at this point.”                       
               We advised petitioner at the 2001 trial that his arguments             
          were frivolous, and we admonished him against advancing them                
          again.  Our admonition at the 2001 trial was insufficient to                
          deter petitioner from returning to the Court and advancing the              
          same frivolous and groundless position in the instant case.                 
          Furthermore, respondent advised petitioner by letter of the                 
          provisions of section 6673, but it also was insufficient to deter           
          petitioner from returning to the Court and advancing a frivolous            
          and groundless position in the instant case.                                
               Accordingly, in light of the fact that petitioner took                 
          frivolous or groundless positions in this proceeding and                    
          instituted this proceeding primarily for delay, pursuant to                 
          section 6673(a) we hold petitioner is liable for a $5,000                   
          penalty.                                                                    
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             for respondent.                          













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  

Last modified: May 25, 2011