Jesse M. and Lura L. Lewis - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          findings in Dixon III and IV, as modified by Dixon V.  Otherwise,           
          the pertinent facts, as set forth in petitioners’ motions and the           
          oppositions thereto, and as summarized in this “Background”                 
          section of our opinion, are undisputed.4                                    
               Respondent determined deficiencies of $935 in petitioners’             
          Federal income taxes for their taxable year 1983, $3,523 for                
          their taxable year 1984, and $2,744 for their taxable year 1986.            
          For all 3 years, respondent also determined that petitioners were           
          liable for additions to tax for negligence or intentional                   
          disregard of rules or regulations under section 6653(a)(1) for              
          1983 and 1984 and under section 6653(a)(1)(A) for 1986, with                
          increased interest under section 6653(a)(2) for 1983 and 1984 and           

               4Motions similar to those under consideration herein have              
          been filed and lodged by other taxpayers, most of whom were                 
          represented by Messrs. O’Donnell and Jones when they settled                
          their cases and who continue to be represented by them in                   
          connection with their pending motions.  In addition, similar                
          motions by still other taxpayers, some represented by Messrs.               
          O’Donnell and Jones and some represented by other attorneys, have           
          not been filed or lodged by the Court for technical reasons and             
          have been returned to the taxpayers’ attorneys.                             
               Still other motions have been filed and lodged on behalf of            
          taxpayers who signed stipulated decisions that were entered                 
          before discovery and revelation of the settlements in the test              
          cases whose concealment was ultimately held in Dixon V to                   
          constitute fraud on the Court.  In two such cases, Kahle v.                 
          Commissioner, docket Nos. 24558-84 and 38976-84, in which the               
          stipulated decisions were agreed to and entered after publication           
          of the Court’s opinion in Dixon II and before the discovery and             
          revelation of the Thompson settlement, respondent has conceded on           
          the record that the taxpayers are entitled to have their                    
          stipulated decisions vacated so that they can become entitled to            
          the benefits of the Thompson settlement as mandated by the Court            
          of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Dixon V.                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011