- 8 - 1324 (11th Cir. 1999); Underwood v. Commissioner, 63 T.C. 468, 477 (1975), affd. 535 F.2d 309 (5th Cir. 1976); Prashker v. Commissioner, 59 T.C. 172 (1972); Perry v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1293, 1296 (1970), affd. 392 F.2d 458 (8th Cir. 1971); Raynor v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 762, 770-771 (1968); Horne v. Commissioner, 5 T.C. 250, 254 (1945). Against this background, we now address whether petitioner may increase his basis in the S corporation by the amount of the loan. We address specifically petitioner’s contention that his personal loan guaranty, the pledge of stock, and the bank’s “control” of Level Propane, either singly or collectively, constitute an economic outlay. Personal Guaranty Shareholder guaranties of loans to an S corporation do not constitute an economic outlay. Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner, supra; Brown v. Commissioner, supra; Spencer v. Commissioner, supra; Calcutt v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 716, 719- 720 (1985); Perry v. Commissioner, supra; Raynor v. Commissioner, supra; Hafiz v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-104. But see Selfe v. United States, 778 F.2d 769, 773 n.7 (11th Cir. 1985). Guaranteeing a bank loan does not constitute an economic outlay because the shareholder is only secondarily liable. See Putnam v. Commissioner, supra at 85. A shareholder must perform underPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011