- 3 - settlement officer. We note that respondent did not call the settlement officer as a witness. Petitioner credibly testified that he submitted a copy of a completed OIC to the settlement officer and informed her that the OIC had been submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in May 2001 before the section 6330 hearing. Petitioner also credibly testified that he raised the issue of reinstating an installment agreement that had been defaulted because of one late return, that he submitted (and resubmitted) a completed Form 433- A, and that he submitted other documents to the settlement officer. Petitioner also credibly testified that the settlement officer refused to consider, or would not reconsider, documents he submitted to the IRS before the section 6330 hearing. Petitioner also credibly testified that there were misunderstandings between him and the settlement officer regarding what years needed to be covered and what information needed to be submitted. Respondent, at the hearing in our Court, noted that petitioner’s testimony contradicted administrative records prepared by the settlement officer and submitted by respondent as an attachment to the motion for summary judgment. As stated supra, factual inferences will be read in a manner most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment. Dahlstrom v.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011