Estate of Marie A. Maniglia, Deceased, Joseph S., Maniglia, Executor - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          Section 2033 provides:  “The value of the gross estate shall                
          include the value of all property to the extent of the interest             
          therein of the decedent at the time of his death.”  See also sec.           
          20.2033-1(a), Estate Tax Regs. (“The gross estate of a decedent             
          * * * includes under section 2033 the value of all property,                
          whether real or personal, * * * beneficially owned by the                   
          decedent at the time of his death.”).  As a general rule, the               
          Commissioner’s determinations in the notice of deficiency are               
          presumed correct, and the burden of proving an error is on the              
          taxpayer.  Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115               
          (1933).6                                                                    
               The estate argues that substance should prevail over form;             
          contending that bare legal title does not establish ownership and           
          that the Court must examine the intent of the parties as well as            
          their conduct to decide that a partnership owned the property.              
          In some circumstances, a taxpayer may rely on substance over                
          form.  Helvering v. F.& R. Lazarus & Co., 308 U.S. 252 (1939).              
          The taxpayer, however, “must provide objective evidence that the            
          substance of the transaction was in accord with the position                
          argued by * * * [the taxpayer] rather than the form set forth by            
          all the relevant documents.”  Groetzinger v. Commissioner, 87               
          T.C. 533, 541 (1986) (emphasis added).  The Court will not                  


               6 The estate does not argue that the burden of proof should            
          be on respondent pursuant to sec. 7491(a).                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011