Miller & Sons Drywall, Inc. - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         
          business’s success is attributable to the employee’s prowess and            
          acumen or to other economic factors.                                        
               Petitioner argues its business was insulated from the                  
          existing economic conditions.  Dr. Sliwoski’s report states that            
          petitioner was shielded from economic fluctuations when compared            
          to other similar businesses because of its exceptional management           
          and business model that focused on consistent sales rather than             
          growth.  Dr. Sliwoski did acknowledge in his report that the                
          economic conditions were favorable for the entire construction              
          industry during much of the 1990s.  Given the favorable economic            
          conditions, respondent urges us to hold that the compensation               
          petitioner paid Darle, Rocky, and Dean was unreasonable.  We                
          agree that the economic conditions were favorable, but whether              
          this factor supports either party depends on how these conditions           
          affected petitioner’s business.                                             
               Petitioner’s gross yearly sales in the 1990s remained fairly           
          consistent.  Only during the tax year ended June 30, 2000, did              
          petitioner have a significant spike in sales.  This spike was               
          mostly attributable to one large job petitioner had obtained.               
          Given petitioner’s business model and its consistent annual gross           
          sales, we believe the economic conditions had, at most, a minimal           
          impact on its success.  In addition, nothing in the record                  
          indicates that any of petitioner’s shareholder-employees worked             
          fewer hours because the economic conditions were favorable.  No             






Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011