John F. Moran - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          records.  “Evidence of the theft of a taxpayer’s records alone is           
          insufficient to excuse substantiation.”  Sumner v. Commissioner,            
          T.C. Memo. 1982-561.  Further, we find the testimony of                     
          petitioner and his daughter relating to the cash payroll self-              
          serving and unreliable.  Petitioner offered no credible evidence            
          to specify the number of employees who received cash                        
          compensation, the length of time that these employees worked for            
          the corporation, or the hourly wage or salary that these                    
          employees received.                                                         
               Petitioner concedes that the corporation failed to record              
          into its books numerous checks that it received from its                    
          customers as payment for services.  Mr. Agresto was not informed            
          of the funds diverted from the corporation.  When Mr. Agresto               
          asked petitioner for a list of employees who received cash wages,           
          petitioner refused.  In the stipulated factual basis for plea               
          relating to petitioner’s criminal case, petitioner admitted that            
          during each of the years in issue he and Ms. McNamara used the              
          diverted corporate receipts for personal expenses.  In that                 
          stipulation, petitioner also admitted that during each of the               
          years in issue the proceeds of the fictitious corporate expense             
          checks were used for personal expenses, including gambling and              
          horse racing expenses.  At his change of plea hearing, petitioner           
          acknowledged that he had read the stipulation and stated that the           
          stipulation was correct.  We find that the evidence clearly and             






Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011