Olsen-Smith, LTD., Smith-Olsen, PLC, Tax Matters Partner - Page 2

                                         -2-                                          
               Brad S. Ostroff and Martha Combellick Patrick (specially               
          recognized), for petitioner.                                                
               Anne W. Durning, for respondent.                                       


                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION                                   

               LARO, Judge:  This case is a partnership-level proceeding              
          subject to the unified audit and litigation procedures of the Tax           
          Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), Pub. L.               
          97-248, sec. 401, 96 Stat. 628.  Smith-Olsen, PLC (Smith/Olsen),            
          the tax matters partner of Olsen-Smith, LTD (LTD), petitioned the           
          Court to readjust partnership items relating to a Notice of Final           
          Partnership Administrative Adjustment (FPAA) issued by the                  
          Commissioner as to LTD’s 1999 taxable year.  LTD is a general               
          partnership the partners of which are three passthrough entities            
          known as limited liability companies (LLCs).  In relevant part,             
          the FPAA determined that LTD’s net earnings from self-employment            
          (NESE) totaled $696,807, instead of $627,736 as reported, on                
          account of a $69,071 increase that the Commissioner made to LTD’s           
          ordinary income.                                                            
               Following concessions, we must decide whether we have                  
          jurisdiction to decide the single substantive issue remaining in            
          dispute.  Specifically, petitioner in an amendment to petition              
          alleged that LTD had no NESE because neither LTD nor any of its             
          partners had a partner or member who was an individual.                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011