- 7 - You correctly point out that IRC �61 defines income. More precisely, �61 defines Gross Income. * * * Sec. 61. Gross Income defined. (a) General definition. Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: (1) Compensation for service, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items; Wages are considered to be compensation for services. The U.S. Tax Court has recently ruled on documents and positions that are substantially identical to the ones you have put forward. (See Christopher Kiley v. Com- missioner, T.C. Memo 2002-315; No. 6676-02L (27 Dec. 2002)) A copy of this case was provided to you at the hearing. In Kiley v. Commissioner, the U.S. Tax Court ruled that the return filed with all -0-‘s and using substantially identical language in the attachments was clearly frivolous. The Court went further and assessed a substantial penalty under IRC �6673 for taking the Court’s time with arguments that have been long settled as a matter of law. A copy of the Court’s warning as provided for in Pierson v. Commissioner was also given to you at the Hearing and explained. No spousal defenses were raised. The only challenges you raised as to the appropriateness of the collection actions were couched in terms of arguments that have previously been identified as frivolous. You offered no alternatives to the proposed enforced collection actions. BALANCING EFFICIENT COLLECTION AND INTRUSIVENESS: The determination of Appeals is that the proposed collection action balances the need for efficient collection of taxes with the intrusiveness of the action since the liabilities are due and owing and the notices of proposed enforced collection action were legally proper. You were notified that the documentsPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011