Donald A. Ramirez - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                          
          respondent abused his discretion in sustaining the Federal tax               
          lien.  Petitioner has yet to pay his outstanding tax liability               
          for 1998.  While an installment agreement has been entered into              
          for petitioner’s outstanding tax liability, that agreement does              
          not preclude respondent from maintaining a lien while taxes are              
          still outstanding.  Secs. 6322 and 6323(j); cf. sec. 301.6323(j)-            
          1, Proced. & Admin. Regs. (Commissioner may withdraw a notice of             
          Federal tax lien under certain conditions).  On the basis of the             
          facts presented, we hold that respondent did not abuse his                   
          discretion in upholding the Federal tax lien.                                
               We have considered all of petitioner’s contentions,                     
          arguments, and requests, and to the extent that they are not                 
          discussed herein, we conclude them to be moot, irrelevant, or                
          without merit.                                                               
               To reflect the foregoing,                                               
                                                   An appropriate order of             
                                              dismissal and decision will be           
                                              entered.                                 





          [Reporter’s Note:  This report was amended by order dated August 3, 2005.]   









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

Last modified: May 25, 2011