Jerome P. and Rhonda A. Reimann - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         

               Respondent determined a deficiency of $10,824 in                       
          petitioners' 2000 Federal income tax and the accuracy-related               
          penalty under section 6662(a) in the amount of $2,254.  The                 
          issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioners are liable for            
          the 10-percent additional tax under section 72(t) for early                 
          distributions from qualified retirement plans, and (2) whether              
          petitioners are liable for the section 6662(a) accuracy-related             
          penalty.  At the time the petition was filed, petitioners were              
          legal residents of Dresden, Ohio.2                                          
               The facts are not in dispute.  Jerome P. Reimann                       
          (petitioner) is a metallurgical engineer and a "manager of                  
          process improvement".  Petitioner explained this latter category            
          as the review of reports from other engineers.  He described his            
          occupation as being in "materials science".  Petitioner has a               
          bachelor of science degree in science and metallurgical                     
          engineering as a graduate of Wayne State University at Detroit,             
          Michigan.  He received his degree in 1977, and his employment has           
          continuously been in that field of endeavor.  In his career,                
          petitioner has been employed by several employers and has been a            
          participant in at least four pension plans qualified under                  
          section 401(a).                                                             


               2    Rule 91(a) requires that the parties stipulate all                
          facts, all documents and papers or contracts or aspects thereof,            
          and all evidence that should fairly not be in dispute.                      
          Petitioners declined to agree to a written stipulation of facts.            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011