Julie J. Revolinski and Kenneth T. White - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
          be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion           
          should not be cited as authority.                                           
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal             
          income tax for the taxable year 2001 of $1,342.                             
               The issue for decision is whether a distribution of $8,944             
          resulting from the surrender of a life insurance policy is                  
          includable in petitioners’ gross income.  We hold that it is.               
          Background                                                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so                
          found.  We incorporate by reference the parties’ stipulation of             
          facts and accompanying exhibits.                                            
               At the time that the petition was filed, petitioners resided           
          in Santa Cruz, California.                                                  
               On July 17, 1987, Kenneth T. White (petitioner) acquired a             
          universal life insurance policy (the policy) with Pacific Mutual            
          Life Insurance Co. (Pacific Life).                                          
               The policy entitled petitioner to withdraw funds against the           
          policy’s accumulated value.  The policy defined accumulated value           
          as the net amount of premiums (premiums paid less premium load              
          charge) plus interest and dividends earned minus deductions                 
          (e.g., withdrawal amounts, mortality charges, administrative                
          charges, insurance loads, and rider chargers).                              
               The policy also entitled petitioner to borrow against the              
          policy as collateral up to the loan value available.  The policy            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011