Robert E. Rhodes - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          the additions to tax pursuant to section 6654(a) for 2000 and               
          2001.                                                                       
          III. Section 6673(a)(1)                                                     
               Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes this Court to require a                  
          taxpayer to pay to the United States a penalty not to exceed                
          $25,000 if the taxpayer took frivolous positions in the                     
          proceeding or instituted the proceedings primarily for delay.  A            
          position maintained by the taxpayer is “frivolous” where it is              
          “contrary to established law and unsupported by a reasoned                  
          colorable argument for change in the law.”  Coleman v.                      
          Commissioner, 791 F.2d 68, 71 (7th Cir. 1986).  In Parker v.                
          Commissioner, 724 F.2d 469, 472 (5th Cir. 1984), affg. T.C. Memo.           
          1983-75, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the               
          court which is the likely venue for appeal, gave a “cautionary              
          note to those who would persistently raise arguments against the            
          income tax which have been put to rest for years.  The full range           
          of sanctions in Rule 38 hereafter shall be summoned in response             
          to a totally frivolous appeal.”                                             
               Prior to trial, petitioner filed several documents                     
          containing frivolous and groundless arguments with the Court.               
          The Court specifically warned petitioner that we may penalize               
          petitioner up to $25,000 pursuant to section 6673 for pursuing              
          arguments that the Court advised him had been rejected as                   
          frivolous by the Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011