James Wilson Richmond, Jr. - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          return of a deduction or credit in an amount that exceeds a                 
          statutory limit.  Sec. 6213(g)(2).                                          
               On his 2000 return, petitioner reported a total tax                    
          liability of $7,437.65--$6,605 tax on taxable income of                     
          $35,757.62 plus $832.65 (approximately 50 percent of the                    
          $1,665.31 self-employment tax he computed).  Respondent assessed            
          a total tax of $11,091.22, rather than the $7,437.65 petitioner             
          reported on the return.  Respondent determined that the                     
          deficiency was attributed to a mathematical error and did not               
          issue a notice of deficiency.  The statutory notice of balance              
          due explaining the changes in the amount of tax assessed is not             
          in the record.                                                              
               The transcript of petitioner’s 2000 taxes reflects that                
          respondent assessed petitioner’s taxes on the basis of $40,350 of           
          adjusted gross income, $33,150 of taxable income, and $5,214 of             
          self-employment tax.  On the basis of those numbers, we conclude            
          that respondent assessed income tax of $5,877 ($11,091 - $5,214)            
          on $33,150 of taxable income, consistent with the tax table for             
          2000.  As a result of respondent’s adjustments, respondent                  
          determined that petitioner underreported his income tax by                  
          $3,653.57 ($11,091.22 - $7,437.65).                                         
               There is no notice of deficiency to explain how respondent             
          computed petitioner’s 2000 tax liability.  At the trial of this             
          case and on brief, respondent explained the correction of                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011