Kevin Ryan Robinson - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

                                         Additions to Tax                             
               Year   Deficiency   Sec. 6651(a)(1)  Sec. 6654(a)                      
               1997    $55,151         $12,388         $2,971                         
               1998     25,421           5,720          1,154                         
               2000     11,687             838             --                         

               All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in             
          effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the           
          Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                  

          Background                                                                  
               Under Rule 91(f)(3), some of the facts have been deemed                
          stipulated and are so found.1                                               
               At the time the petition was filed, petitioner was a                   
          resident of Edgefield, South Carolina.                                      
               For 1996, a year not in issue, petitioner filed his 1996               
          individual Federal income tax return and indicated thereon a                




               1  On July 9, 2004, respondent filed a Motion To Show Cause            
          Why Proposed Facts In Evidence Should Not Be Accepted As                    
          Established (Rule 91(f) motion).  On July 27, 2004, the Court               
          issued an order granting respondent’s Rule 91(f) motion and                 
          directing petitioner to file a response to the motion by Aug. 27,           
          2004.  The July 27, 2004, order also explained that failure by              
          petitioner to respond to any matter set forth in respondent’s               
          Rule 91(f) motion, including the proposed stipulation of facts,             
          would result in such matter’s being deemed stipulated for                   
          purposes of the instant case.  Petitioner failed to respond to              
          respondent’s Rule 91(f) motion, and, on Sept. 8, 2004, the Court            
          made absolute its July 27, 2004, order, and the facts set forth             
          in the proposed stipulation of facts were deemed stipulated for             
          purposes of trial and opinion herein.                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011