- 2 - income tax. The issue for decision is whether the underpayment of tax required to be shown on petitioner’s 1991 Federal income tax return is due to negligence or intentional disregard of rules or regulations. Background Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in Athens, Alabama. A. Hoyt Partnerships Walter J. Hoyt III (Mr. Hoyt) and some members of the Hoyt family (hereinafter collectively referred to as Hoyt) were in the business of organizing and promoting cattle-breeding partnerships. From 1971 through 1992, Mr. Hoyt organized and operated as a general partner nearly 100 partnerships.2 On February 12, 2001, Mr. Hoyt was convicted in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon of 1 count of conspiracy to commit fraud, 31 counts of mail fraud, 3 counts of bankruptcy fraud, and 17 counts of money laundering. See United 2 For a general description of the Hoyt organization and its operation, see Bales v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-568; see also River City Ranches #1, Ltd. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-150, affd. in part, revd. in part and remanded 401 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2005); Mekulsia v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-138, affd. 389 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 2004); Durham Farms #1, J.V. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-159, affd. 59 Fed. Appx. 952 (9th Cir. 2003); and River City Ranches #4, J.V. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-209, affd. 23 Fed. Appx. 744 (9th Cir. 2001).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011