-113- membership interest to Imperial at a substantial loss. Under section 704(c), Imperial succeeded to SMP’s inside basis in the $79 million receivable. When the $79 million receivable was sold to TroMetro, Imperial (and to some extent SMP) was allocated the substantial loss from that sale, effectively duplicating the loss that SMP had realized on the sales of its Corona membership interest. II. Burden of Proof Generally, in actions to redetermine respondent’s partnership-level adjustments in an FPAA, as in other actions in this Court, the burden of proof is on petitioner, unless otherwise provided by statute or determined by the Court. Rules 142(a), 240(a); Saba Pship. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-31. Respondent has pleaded new matter in his amendments to answer, filed April 23, 2004; specifically, that SMP’s reported tax basis in its SMHC stock should be adjusted to zero and that SMP’s sales of receivables to TroMetro should be treated as sales of an option to acquire an equity interest in SMHC or its successor. Under Rule 142(a), respondent bears the burden of proof with respect to this new matter.82 82 Petitioner contends that respondent’s pretrial memorandum raises certain issues, generally relating to the bona fides of the $79 million receivable, that constitute new matter. We disagree. The issues in question relate to the adjustments determined in the FPAAs.Page: Previous 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011