Santa Monica Pictures, LLC, Perry Lerner, Tax Matters Partner - Page 270

                                       - 37 -                                         
          and UA entities, including the more recent corporate                        
          restructurings.  The Kaye Scholer memorandum also provided a                
          discussion of CDR’s tax basis in MGM Holdings stock ($605                   
          million), MGM Holdings’s tax basis in MGM Group Holdings stock              
          ($483 million), MGM Group Holdings’s tax basis in New MGM stock             
          ($300 million), New MGM’s tax basis in its assets ($1.14                    
          billion), as well as tax loss carryforwards, and net operating              
          loss carryforwards.                                                         
               A memorandum dated May 31, 1996, from Kaye Scholer to                  
          Capella Films, which Mr. Lerner received, describes an “MGM                 
          Acquisition/Partnership Structure” and explains:                            
                    The proposed structure outlined herein would                      
               increase the amount receivable by CDR over a straight                  
               purchase.  Under the proposed structure CDR would                      
               contribute the $873 million of debt owed to it by MGM                  
               to the capital of Holdings, which in turn would                        
               contribute the debt to Group, which in turn would                      
               contribute the debt to MGM.  Such contributions would                  
               increase the tax basis of the stock of each of the                     
               companies.  As a result, CDR would have a tax basis in                 
               the stock of Holdings of approximately $1.478 billion.                 
               CDR would then form a limited liability company (the                   
               ‘LLC’) by contributing the stock of Holdings in                        
               exchange for a 99% interest in the LLC.  An unrelated                  
               party would receive a 1% interest in exchange for a                    
               nominal amount.  Then CDR would sell half of its                       
               interest, or 49.5% of the LLC, to an investor who could                
               benefit from the use of a capital loss (“Investor”).                   
               The LLC would not make an election under section 754                   
               * * * to adjust the basis of its assets.  Group would                  
               then sell the stock of MGM to Capella and make an                      
               election under section 338(h)(10) of the Code to treat                 
               the stock sale as an asset sale.  Group would use a                    
               portion of the proceeds to repay to CDR the $970                       
               million of debt.  The remainder of the proceeds would                  
               be held by Group, other than the amount necessary to                   
               pay any taxes on the sale (inasmuch as MGM’s NOL’s may                 





Page:  Previous  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011