Olivia Scibilia - Page 4

                                         -4-                                          
               Section 6331(a) provides that where taxpayers refuse to pay            
          the tax for which they are liable within 10 days after notice and           
          demand for payment, the Commissioner may collect such tax by levy           
          on their property.  See also sec. 7701(a)(11)(B) and (12).                  
          Section 6330 provides that the Commissioner cannot proceed with             
          collection by levy until the taxpayer has been given notice and             
          the opportunity for administrative review.  Davis v.                        
          Commissioner, 115 T.C. 35, 37 (2000).  The Court reviews                    
          nonliability administrative determinations for abuse of                     
          discretion.  Hoffman v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 140, 144-145                 
          (2002); Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 610 (2000).                     
               Petitioner raises no valid legal arguments.  She alleges in            
          her petition that respondent erred in not letting her argue to              
          Appeals that the subject income was properly reported and taxed             
          as capital gains income.  Her argument is mistaken.  Petitioner,            
          having received a notice of deficiency and having forgone the               
          opportunity to challenge her underlying liability, is barred from           
          doing so during a section 6330 hearing.3  See sec. 6330(c)(2)(B);           

               3 Petitioner does not argue that she did not receive the               
          notice of deficiency.  She does appear to argue she had a right             
          to a hearing with Appeals before the notice of deficiency was               
          issued, and that respondent’s failure to conduct such a hearing             
          invalidates the notice of deficiency.  We know of no such right             
          under the minimal standards for notices of deficiency and hold              
          that the notice is valid.  See Abrams v. Commissioner, 84 T.C.              
          1308 (1985), affd. 814 F.2d 1356 (9th Cir. 1987), affd. 787 F.2d            
          939 (4th Cir. 1986), affd. sub nom. Donley v. Commissioner, 791             
          F.2d 383 (5th Cir. 1986), affd. sub nom. Gaska v. Commissioner,             
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011