-4- Section 6331(a) provides that where taxpayers refuse to pay the tax for which they are liable within 10 days after notice and demand for payment, the Commissioner may collect such tax by levy on their property. See also sec. 7701(a)(11)(B) and (12). Section 6330 provides that the Commissioner cannot proceed with collection by levy until the taxpayer has been given notice and the opportunity for administrative review. Davis v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 35, 37 (2000). The Court reviews nonliability administrative determinations for abuse of discretion. Hoffman v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 140, 144-145 (2002); Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 610 (2000). Petitioner raises no valid legal arguments. She alleges in her petition that respondent erred in not letting her argue to Appeals that the subject income was properly reported and taxed as capital gains income. Her argument is mistaken. Petitioner, having received a notice of deficiency and having forgone the opportunity to challenge her underlying liability, is barred from doing so during a section 6330 hearing.3 See sec. 6330(c)(2)(B); 3 Petitioner does not argue that she did not receive the notice of deficiency. She does appear to argue she had a right to a hearing with Appeals before the notice of deficiency was issued, and that respondent’s failure to conduct such a hearing invalidates the notice of deficiency. We know of no such right under the minimal standards for notices of deficiency and hold that the notice is valid. See Abrams v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 1308 (1985), affd. 814 F.2d 1356 (9th Cir. 1987), affd. 787 F.2d 939 (4th Cir. 1986), affd. sub nom. Donley v. Commissioner, 791 F.2d 383 (5th Cir. 1986), affd. sub nom. Gaska v. Commissioner, (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011