- 31 - Thus, the Internal Revenue Service is generally limited to one inspection of a taxpayer’s books and records for each taxable year unless the taxpayer requests a second audit or the Service notifies the taxpayer in writing that an additional inspection is necessary. United States v. Powell, supra; De Masters v. Arend, 313 F.2d 79, 85 (9th Cir. 1963). However, the review of records of third parties does not constitute an inspection of the taxpayer’s books and records. Digby v. Commissioner, supra at 447. Moreover, mere communication with the taxpayer does not fall within the scope of an inspection of books and records. Benjamin v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 1084, 1098-1099 (1976), affd. 592 F.2d 1259 (5th Cir. 1979). With this background we consider petitioner’s contention that respondent has violated the requirements of section 7605(b) by subjecting petitioner to three separate inspections of her books and records. Petitioner attached to her Form 1040 for taxable year 1999, a “Special Handling” cover letter requesting a review of her return. Petitioner presented no evidence that respondent audited her return as a result of this request. In fact, respondent mailed petitioner a letter thanking her for her inquiry and stating that the IRS had not “resolved the matter.” Such a response to a taxpayer’s inquiry does not constitute anPage: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011