Donald A. and Virginia M. Singer - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
              $50.00 on a five year renewable basis, prescription                     
              drug co-payments have increased and city and county                     
              property taxes on our home have increased.  Also, no                    
              consideration was given to the monthly interest                         
              payments which we will incur on the $10,000 line of                     
              credit we will need for the initial payment.                            
                                     Discussion                                       
              Section 6330 provides that no levy may be made on any                   
         property or right to property of a person unless the Secretary               
         first notifies the person in writing of the right to a hearing               
         before the Appeals Office.  Section 6330(c)(1) provides that the             
         Appeals officer must verify at the hearing that applicable laws              
         and administrative procedures have been followed.  At the                    
         hearing, the person may raise any relevant issue relating to the             
         unpaid tax or the proposed levy, including appropriate spousal               
         defenses, challenges to the appropriateness of collection                    
         actions, and collection alternatives.  Sec. 6330(c)(2)(A).                   
         However, the person may challenge the existence or amount of the             
         underlying tax liability only if the person did not receive any              
         statutory notice of deficiency for the tax liability or did not              
         otherwise have an opportunity to dispute the tax liability.  Sec.            
         6330(c)(2)(B); Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 610 (2000).               
              In the instant case, petitioners do not dispute the                     
         underlying tax liability.  Rather, petitioners dispute                       
         respondent’s rejection of the offer in compromise.  Accordingly,             
         we review the administrative determination for abuse of                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011