Ronald Lee Snyder - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
               The taxpayer has not filed delinquent returns for 2000                 
               and 2001.  This precluded discussion of collection                     
               alternatives.                                                          
               The taxpayer has raised only frivolous arguments.                      
               During the hearing, the taxpayer was unwilling to                      
               discuss the legitimate issues.                                         
               The taxpayer did not raise any other relevant issues.                  
               III. Balancing the Need for Efficient Collection with the              
                    Taxpayer’s Concern that the Collection Action be no               
                    More Intrusive than Necessary                                     
               Has efficient tax collection been balanced with concern                
               regarding intrusiveness of the proposed collection                     
               action?                                                                
               IRC �6330 requires that the Settlement Officer consider                
               whether any collection action balances the need for                    
               efficient collection of taxes with the taxpayer’s                      
               legitimate concern that any collection action be no                    
               more intrusive than necessary.                                         
               The taxpayer has not participated meaningfully in                      
               trying to resolve his tax liability and has insisted                   
               instead on using frivolous arguments, which have re-                   
               peatedly been dismissed by the courts.                                 
               Appeals sustains Collection’s decision to issue a levy                 
               as its next collection tool for resolving the tax-                     
               payer’s tax account.                                                   
               Summary of Decision                                                    
               Appeals sustains Collection’s decision to levy to                      
               collect the balance due on the taxpayer’s account.  The                
               taxpayer is not in compliance with filing requirements                 
               for individual income tax returns.  The taxpayer raised                
               no relevant issues with regards to collection alterna-                 
               tives.                                                                 
               On April 28, 2003, petitioner filed a petition with the                
          Court in response to the notice of determination and the decision           
          letter.  Except for an argument under section 7521(a)(1), the               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011